Scientific Arguments

• The Theory of Evolution
• Astronomy

1. The Kuiper and Asteroid Belts
2. The Evidence for The Big Bang
3. The Star of Revelation 8

• Taxonomy
• The Math of the Flood
• Speaking In Tongues/Glossolalia
• More on Glossolalia

Arguments from the Bible

• Biblical Inconsistencies

1. Cain’s wife
2. Marriage
3. The Unjust Judge
4. Calvinism vs. Arminianism
5. Murder or No Murder
6. Saul’s Death
7. Judas’ Death
8. The Ark of the Covenant
9. Know Me or Know Me Not?
10. Innocence
11. Generational Curses

• The Reason Why a Christian Cannot Hold Evolution as True
• No Sin, No Christ
• Jesus was not the Messiah

Historical Arguments

• The Divine Jesus Didn’t Exist

This is a course on the New Testament, courtesy of Yale University.  It is an unbiased study of the Bible.  As one will notice in this course, the Bible is flawed.  Moreover, one will conclude that if Jesus did exist, he was not divine.  That is made evident by the fact that no historians at the time even wrote of him.  One can name Josephus.  However, scholars believe that the mention of Christ was an interpolation (added in ex post de facto).  One can mention the Talmud.  However, when considering the shorter human lifespans of those times, it is safe to assume that no eye witnesses were alive nearly a century after the supposed death of Christ.  Given the inconsistencies and contradictions, is it possible that god preserved his word?  This is my latest response to the argument of preservation:

If the Bible is the word of god, why isn’t it self-evident?  Why does it lack in critical details?  Why is it historically and scientifically inaccurate?  A common argument is that god preserved his word.  If so, why does the Bible leave furlongs of space for skepticism?  Can man or the devil be blamed when considering that god preserves his word?  Thus, it is safe to conclude, that god has not preserved his word.  He is then fully responsible for every Atheist that has lived, lives, and will live.  Therefore, he is purposely condemning some while saving others.  Nonetheless, god does not show favoritism (Romans 2:11).  He would then be contradicting himself.  Ultimately, it is safe to conclude that the Christian god does not exist.  If it takes this much deception to prove his word right, his word is definitely and absolutely wrong.

• The History of the Book of Daniel
• The History of the Book of Revelation
• The History Refuting the Flood
• A History of God

1. Part 1
2. Part 2

Refuting Philosophical Arguments for God

• The Moral Argument Refuted

1. The moral violations of god
2. Further violations

• The Ontological Argument Refuted
• The Teleological Argument Refuted
• The Cosmological Argument Refuted
• The Argument from Desire Refuted
  
• Why Do The Arguments For God Fail?

Philosophical Arguments

• The Resurrection:  A Philosophical Overview
• All or Nothing Philosophy
• The Christian Fallacy
• A Logical Argument Proving that the Bible Isn’t the Word of God
• The Argument from Assailability

Anthropological Arguments

• Cultural Parallels

1. Narakas vs. Hell
2. The Pyramid Texts vs. The Bible
3. Zoroastrianism and Christianity
4. Mithraism and Christianity
5. The Epic of Gilgamesh vs. The Flood
6. Phariseeism vs. Christianity

Miscellaneous

• Deconversion Video Series