in-the-right:

The part where mutations cause a species to become more complicated.

Evolution does not state that.

The part where a species changes species entirely.

What does that mean?

The part where a living organism was formed from inanimate sludge at the beginning of the universe, and eventually that sludge became this mammal’s ancestor.

Evolution doesn’t state that either.  This is all a straw man—an ignorant understanding of what evolution actually is.  As I recall, you said you wouldn’t reply to me and then accused me of arrogance; yes, I recall correctly (read here).  Anyone who disagrees with you and is better educated on this matter will seem arrogant.  It’s easy to be highly confident when one actually knows something, but as you may have already noticed, confidence isn’t arrogance.  You’re only pretending to know something based on biased websites; thus, arrogance lies on your end.  Then you dare call yourself scientific.  Well, scientists and them who are scientifically literate don’t ignore questions and/or outright challenges due to so called arrogance.  From your point of view, creationism is correct; you also consider yourself scientifically literate.  Therefore, it should worry you that so many people are against creationism and it should worry you that people are able to address your links; it should worry you enough to warrant answers or clarifications on your part.  So again I ask you to step up or step out and go learn evolutionary biology; you have demonstrated time and time again that you know nothing of evolution.